![]() But those are the tricks that work for me. And I just know the opposite of those are what decease it, so I don’t memorize those. So if I can just remember just the letters, when I see it on exam, I can usually pick them out. Hypercarbia, hypoxia, high hct, hypothermia, atelectasis, acidosis, pain, peep, light anesthesia, nitrous, vasoconstrictor, sns stimulation. And then I’ll write the mnemonics out 10x. I make up things to trigger myself like, things that increase PVR: Hx4, Ax2, Px2, NLVS. If I’m struggling with what I read, if I write it how I understand it, it shows me what I’m missing/need to figure out. That’s why I didn’t touch apex til the end, I was worried I’d remember questions and answers not the why. If I read it, I usually get it or have good recall of it. I studied everything else when I was not in clinical-lectures, PowerPoints, read barash and Miller and naglehout, went over 2 other reviews (prodigy and valley), etc-the whole last year and far more intensely the last 6months.Īhh, yeah my learning style is reading/writing. I saved and studied APEX, a SPECIFIC board prep course, for the 3weeks before boards-I wanted an in-depth overview/review fresh in my brain before boards. I’ll update later with how it went, just wanted to throw this out there in the void, because I appreciated looking at other people’s posts and trying to gauge where I’m at compared/see similar experiences.Įverything they say says I should be fine but DANG I’M NERVOUS!!Įdit 2: since some trolls decided to take this to noctor, let me clarify. D exams are mostly 50-60s-those suckers suck. Really only started studying seriously when I was done completely with school (had some family stuff this last semester) and so I’ve hammered apex for the last 3 weeks.Īpex Mock exams 1-2 were 50s, 3-4 were 60s, 5-6 were 75, and 7 was 70 today. See scores were 444, 423, and I didn’t study for them at all so I could see where my weaknesses were. … I have no hesitation recommending this book to anyone who wants to learn how to improve the art of regional anesthesia.” (Tariq M.I have a 4.0, done well in clinical. It also will help anyone, whether a nurse or a physician running an acute pain service in a pediatric hospital. ![]() … The book targets all practicing pediatric anesthesiologists who wish to practice or improve their regional anesthesia skill. “The primary purpose is to provide an image-based, regional anesthesia book for pediatric anesthesiologists. Both trainees and consultants looking to learn about regional anesthesia will find this textbook a valuable resource.” (Arie Peliowski, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, January, 2016) … This atlas is suitable for anesthesiologists at all levels of experience. The images and visual components are outstanding. It gives a straightforward, easy-to-understand explanation of the important theoretical aspects as well as detailed, useful descriptions of the practical components of regional anesthesia. “This book is an excellent guide to regional anesthetic techniques in children.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |